DMGB / SYSTEMS v426

THE FIELD GUIDE / 013 · SURFACES

A thin layer.
Several different jobs.

Think of a raincoat, a dusty window, or a wet road. Each surface needs a different test.

A tiny gap can let much more water through a coating. An electric field can push a charged dust grain, but that alone does not prove a surface gets clean. Start with these everyday examples, then explore what the calculations can and cannot tell us.

See why a small gap matters ↓

A very simple version

Imagine this

A tiny hole in a raincoat can let water through. A surface can also push away dust, but a picture alone cannot show if it works well outside the model.

For curious readers: how it could help and what the evidence says

How it could help people

Today, surface measurements help compare coating leaks, dust-removal ideas and worn textures. A chosen surface might help in a particular setting after testing.

Evidence and limits

The page calculates prescribed flow and an ideal charged-grain force. Real charging, contact, wear and cleaning performance need measurement.

Read-aloud starter; not yet tested with children. The fuller science, data, figures and sources follow below.

01 / CONTINUITY MATTERS

A tiny patch can carry
a large share of the flow.

Imagine a coated tile. Most of its area transmits little water vapour; a degraded patch transmits more per unit area. Under the same fixed conditions, add the two contributions. This model prescribes each local flow—it does not predict real-hole leakage from its appearance.

Conceptual coating cross-section with a degraded path, above an inert substrate. Arrows and thickness are not to scale.Intact coatingDegraded pathInert substrate · conceptual, not to scale
Total / intact reference
Flow through degraded patch

Share of flow: pink = degraded; blue = intact. This bar shows flow, not area.

At 0.1% area and an assumed ratio of 1,000, total flow is 1.999 times the reference. The small patch carries 50.025% of it.

Method and limits

For degraded area fraction f and relative local flux r: total = (1−f)+rf; degraded share = rf/total. Equal contributions occur at f=1/(r+1).

Independent steady parallel patches, identical fixed driving conditions and positive intact flux are assumed. Lateral transport, spreading resistance, boundary layers, geometry, sorption and depletion are absent. Real defect leakage needs more information. No microbial barrier, skin protection or service lifetime follows.

See the intact-film moisture budget for a separate time-accounting lesson.

02 / CHARGE CHANGES THE DIRECTION

A field acts on a grain.
A voltage label is not a cleaning result.

A charged grain feels electric force F=qE. Reversing charge reverses that force. Voltage is a potential difference; the field also depends on distance and geometry.

Upward uniform field 10,000 V/m; density 2,500 kg/m³; g=9.80665 m/s². Charge is independently chosen, not a measured charging law. One femtocoulomb (fC) is 10⁻¹⁵ C.

Signed electric force / weight
Initial upward acceleration

At 10 µm and +1 fC, the electric force is upward but weaker than weight: initial net acceleration remains downward, about −8.852 m/s². A ratio of +1 balances only these two forces; it does not establish stable levitation.

Why this does not predict dust removal

Mass = 4πρr³/3; weight = mg; electric force = qE; net upward acceleration = qE/m−g. Doubling radius multiplies mass by eight at fixed density.

The grain is free, with no substrate contact. Adhesion, drag, buoyancy, polarization, image forces, collisions, charge exchange and field gradients are omitted. A neutral grain has zero qE here; polarization can matter in nonuniform fields and requires another model.

Real dust shields use a changing field pattern

NASA's electrodynamic dust shields use embedded electrodes and phased signals to produce a travelling nonuniform field. Grain properties, contact and operating environment matter. These documented independent devices are not described by our free-grain calculation. Their demonstrations do not establish performance for an unspecified coating.

03 / AFTER WATER AND WEAR

A rough surface is not
a measured grip rating.

Fine texture helps tyre contact. Larger texture provides water pathways and affects noise. Polishing can alter the fine texture; blocked drainage or cracks cause different problems.

Fresh

Identify material, texture, substrate and bonding. Appearance alone gives no friction coefficient.

Wet

Measure friction under specified water, contact and speed conditions. Assess drainage separately.

Worn

Repeat after polishing, abrasion and thermal cycling. Inspect cracks, joints and repairability.

A material that melts or hardens has not passed a road test. No candidate dataset supports a numerical grip curve here. A conventional glass-containing mixture would be a separately defined material, not proof of an unspecified monolithic road surface.

04 / THE WHOLE LIFE OF A FILM

Protection includes
what happens when it comes off.

On an inert tile: apply a specified film → expose it to service → remove it by a specified method → inspect the substrate. These are proposed measurements, not completed tests.

While in place

Measure continuity, adhesion, wear, moisture transmission and wet/dry friction separately. Charge dissipation requires an electrical path and its own geometry-dependent measurement.

During removal

Record the required method and effort. Strong adhesion and easy removal can conflict; neither is universally preferable.

After removal

Inspect residue and substrate damage. Clean-looking is not disinfected. No food-contact or skin suitability is established.

Different formulations can demonstrate different functions. Combining their descriptions does not establish one multifunctional material. No recipe, universal score or measured project lifetime is supplied.

ORIGINAL CALCULATIONS / REPRODUCIBLE STUDIES

Inspect the curves.
Keep their assumptions attached.

Hypothetical parallel-patch transport curves show how degraded area and prescribed local transmission determine total flow and its degraded share.
303 deterministic cases. No experimental error bars; prescribed independent pathways.

CSV data · Methods · Reproduction script · PDF figure

Signed electric force relative to weight for hypothetical positive, zero and negative charges across grain sizes, with the balancing charge plotted separately.
495 deterministic cases. The signed force plot has a linear central region and logarithmic outer regions; balancing-charge axes are logarithmic. Neither plot predicts detachment.

CSV data · Methods · Reproduction script · PDF figure

What could this help improve?

Find whether defects or intact material dominate equipment protection. Investigate dust control for optical and thermal surfaces under actual contact conditions. Select temporary coatings across their service-and-removal cycle. Assess road materials after water and wear. These are practical research questions, not claims of newly demonstrated products.

Primary reading

Back to the field guide →